northdan.
Vezi pagina în română

IT Glossary

What is UI?

User Interface: everything the user sees and touches — screens, buttons, colours, type, spacing — the face and clothing of a digital product.

UI — the user interface — is the concrete layer where a person meets your product: the screens, buttons, forms, colours, typefaces, icons, spacing and motion between them. Its partner concept is UX (the experience — how the whole thing flows), and the distinction is worth keeping sharp for conversations with designers: UX decides which steps a user takes and why; UI decides how each step looks and communicates. A good interface can be judged on verifiable criteria rather than taste. Clarity: on any screen, 'what do I do here?' should answer itself within seconds, with visual hierarchy leading the eye. Consistency: the same elements look and behave identically everywhere — which is the value of design systems, libraries of reusable components that keep a product coherent and each new screen cheaper. Feedback: every action gets a visible response (pressed, loading, succeeded, failed) — mute interfaces produce users who click three times and duplicate orders. Accessibility: sufficient contrast, touch-friendly targets, legibility — increasingly a legal obligation in Europe, not just good manners. For buyers, two habits pay off: judge portfolios on functional products similar in nature to yours, and insist the delivery includes the documented design system, not just screen images — it is the difference between a design that develops coherently and one each programmer reinterprets.

Let’s talk about your project

Message us on WhatsApp or send an email — you talk directly to a developer.

office@northdan.com · +40 752 070 247

Why it matters for your business

A professionalised first impression

A well-kept interface transmits seriousness instantly — users judge a company's solidity by the only layer they see: the screen.

Clarity that converts

Correct visual hierarchy leads the eye toward the action — the obvious button and the plain next step count directly in submitted forms.

A system, not scattered screens

A library of reused components keeps the product coherent and makes each new screen cheaper — design becomes an asset, not a recurring cost.

Frequently asked questions

UI versus UX — do I really need to care about the difference?

For commissioning work correctly, yes: 'users cannot find things or abandon flows' is UX (structure and logic, fixed with research and restructuring); 'it looks dated, untrustworthy or chaotic' is UI (visual language, fixed with a system-based redesign). The wrong diagnosis buys the wrong intervention — ask the vendor for a diagnosis explicitly.

What should a UI design delivery include?

More than screen images: the design system (components, colours, type, states — documented, ideally in an organised Figma library), specifications for developers (dimensions, behaviours, responsive variants) and usage rules. The difference shows at the first new screen built after the designer leaves: with a system it comes out coherent and cheap; without, every addition reinterprets the style and the product degrades visually in instalments.

Our product's interface looks dated — full redesign or a refresh?

It depends on the foundation: if structure and flows work and only the aesthetics stayed behind, a refresh on a new design system — modernised colours, type and components applied gradually — delivers the transformation at a fraction of the cost and risk; if the flows creak too, serious redesign starts from UX. What to avoid: the total redesign born of internal boredom, where regular users pay the relearning cost and the numbers rarely justify it.